2024-08-01 00:43:19
Red Pilled America is a weekly storytelling show that tells the tales Hollywood and the Globalist don't want you to hear. You can think of RPA as audio documentaries. This pioneering series is broadcast every Friday and is hosted by Patrick Courrielche & Adryana Cortez. For the full archive of episodes, visit RedPilledAmerica.com
Hi everybody, it's Katie Couric. Have you heard about? My newsletter? Called Body and Soul? It has everything you need to know about health and wellness, from skincare and serums to meditation and brain health, we've got you covered.
And, most importantly, it's information you can trust. Everything is vetted by experts at the top of their field. Just sign up at katiecouric.com slash bodyandsoul that's k-a-t-i-e-c-o-u-r-i-c dot com slash bodyandsoul.
I promise you'll be happier and healthier if you do.
I'm Jacob Goldstein. I used to host Planet Money. Now I'm starting a new show. It's called What's Your Problem? every week on What's Your Problem. Entrepreneurs and engineers describe the future they're going to build.
Once they solve a few problems, I'm talking to people, trying to figure out how to do things that no one on the planet knows how to do. From creating a drone delivery business to building a car that can truly drive itself. Listen to What's Your Problem? on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
My name is Michael Wolff. Each week on Fire Fury, the podcast, I take you deeper into the mind of Donald Trump and his campaign than any other journalist ever goes. I've written three books on Trump. But for some reason, the people around him, they keep on talking to me to find out what they tell me. Listen to Fire Fury The Podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey guys, don't forget to watch our very first video documentary. It's called Rescue Ruse How Sound of Freedom Conned Christians. You can watch it now for free at Redpilledamerica..com. It's the first video version of our pioneering audio documentary show. Advertising alone does not cover the cost of doing this kind of investigative storytelling.
To support the show, please consider becoming a backstage subscriber. You'll get ad-free access to our entire back catalog of episodes and our behind-the-scenes podcast. Just visit redpilledamerica..com and click Join in the top menu that's redpilledamerica..com and click Join in the top menu. Now enjoy the show.
This episode was originally broadcast on December 5th, 2019, previously on Red Pilled America.
Of all the cases that I've worked on, this tops top 2 or 3 of cases. That is serious injustice.
I did the work of significantly reforming the criminal justice system.
Senator Harris, when you were in a position to make a difference and an impact in these people's lives, you did not. Marion had real problems with telling the truth.
He thought Marion's physical examination was inconsistent with her rape allegations. If this guy was a guy who would have sex with somebody that young, there's not a prosecutor.
In this country, who would offer him three years?
You're making, I think, a strong case on the merits.
We think it's fair for us to say at this point that George Gage is innocent of this crime. In what way would it be dangerous for you?
I'm like, kill me.
I'm Patrick Kuralche.
And I'm Adriana Cortez.
And this is Red Pilled America, a storytelling show.
This is not another talk show covering the day's news, we're all about telling stories.
Stories Hollywood doesn't want you to hear.
Stories The media mocks stories about everyday Americans that the globalists ignore.
You can think of Red Pilled America as audio documentaries. And we promise only one thing.
The truth?
Welcome to red pilled America.
This is our fourth and final installment of our Lie Detector series. Over the course of the past three episodes. We've been telling the story of a Texas girl named Marion, who accused a man of sexual assault. And the story of George Gage, the man who was convicted of it. Last week. We dug deep into the case against George, searching for any hint of evidence that he committed the crime that has put him behind bars for over two decades. But everywhere we looked pointed towards George being innocent, the tipping point for us was the physical evidence.
In so many words. Both the prosecution and defense medical experts testified that. If Marion had been subject to the sexual assaults she was alleging before reaching puberty, there would have been signs of the abuse in her physical exam. According to Marion, the molestations began at least since the age of six, yet the evaluating physician found no signs of abuse. Combined with Marion's own mother severely damaging her credibility by calling her a pathological liar that lives her lies, we came to the conclusion that George Gage was innocent of the crime that Marion was accusing him of.
So how was George Gage convicted with no physical evidence, no witness to the crime, and with no prior record? Even after the trial, judge called for a new trial and the ninth circuit panel of judges expressed their concern about his conviction. Why is George Gage still behind bars? Americans all like to think that innocent people aren't sentenced to life in prison. But what we've learned while researching this story is that in a court of law, if you are up against an ambitious prosecutor who's seeking more power, our system can easily break down.
In those instances, the case is no longer about seeking justice. This phenomenon can be seen when George Gage's case hit the office of then Attorney General Kamala Harris.
Shortly after Barack Obama's historic rise to the Oval Office, Kamala Harris was already being groomed for the White House.
There's a great district attorney in San Francisco whose name is Kamala Harris. She's brilliant, she's smart, she doesn't look anything like anybody you ever see on law and order, yet she's tough and she's got a big future. They call her the Female Barack Obama.
I mean, people aren't very imaginative about these things anymore.
I mentioned in one of the teases for your segment, Kamala, that you have been called by some the female. Barack Obama Do you have ambitions for national Office?
You know, it's one step at a time.
As early as 2009, her name was already on the lips of media heavyweights like David Letterman, Matt Lauer and even kingmaker Oprah Winfrey.
With a 90 percent conviction rate, superstar prosecutor Kamala Harris made history when she was elected California's first African-American female district attorney. Law enforcement has such a direct impact on the most vulnerable people in the community, and I want it to be at the table when the decisions are being made. I'm proud of creating a child assault unit dedicated to prosecuting those kinds of cases because I think they deserve the most serious of consequences.
By the end of Obama's first year in office. The young Jamaican Indian American lawyer published her book, Smart on Crime, branding herself as a criminal justice reformer and protector of children.
She's California's most innovative district attorney.
Kamala Harris created a long overdue child assault unit.
In 2010, the rising Democrat star ran for Attorney General of California, and she won.
Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, please welcome to the podium the honorable California Attorney General, Kamala Devi Harris.
Okay, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you.
Two years later, Kamala was one of the few elected officials to be given a prime speaking spot at the Democratic National Convention.
I thank you for the honor and privilege to be here.
So let's get right down to business. We are here because we love our country.
Her ascent within the Democrat party put her on the radar of President Obama, who took time to speak about her at a San Francisco area fundraiser. And when he did, his comments sparked a minor controversy.
Now the president is getting some flack for something, he said. In California yesterday, it happened at a Democratic National Committee fundraiser, which was closed to cameras. While he praised California's Attorney General, Kamala Harris, the president called her quote by far the best looking attorney general in the country. There was a lot of backlash online, social media, Twitter, I think we all know.
Sometimes you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube, things just come out of your mouth sometimes. Controversial comments by President Obama earlier today at a fundraiser in the peninsula, he said. Attorney General Kamala Harris is quote by far the best looking Attorney General President Obama yesterday called California Attorney General Kamala Harris by far the best looking attorney general.
It created quite a buzz and an uproar. Some say it highlights what they see as a troubling pattern of a woman's success being linked to her appearance. And that it's unseemly for the president of the United States to say that. How has he reflected on his comments since making them, and has he called Harris? The president did speak with Attorney General Harris last night after he came back from.
His trip, and he called her to apologize for the distraction created by his comments.
The story made it obvious that Kamala Harris was becoming a national figure. It was only a matter of time before the attorney general would make a move for Washington, D.C. That day arrived on January 8, 2015, with an announcement by California Senator Barbara Boxer.
I am never going to retire, but I will not be running for the Senate in 2016.
If you're a California Democrat who's been waiting to run for the United States Senate, you've been waiting 22 years. For the last 22 years, Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein have represented California in the United States Senate. And no serious Democrat ever considered challenging them. In their reelection campaigns. Barbara Boxer has opened the way now by announcing that she will not run for reelection.
So just five days after the news, Kamala Harris threw her hat into the ring for the liberal politician's Senate seat.
And making it official today, California's Attorney General, Kamala Harris, announced that she will indeed run for the U.
S Senate California Attorney General and former San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris announced her bid for the U.S Senate. She hopes to win Senator Barbara Boxer's seat after Boxer retires in 2016..
Attorney General Kamala Harris is the first official entrant into the Senate race, but political insiders say her announcement today will spur several other contenders to act soon.
It was a bold move. Major players like Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, former L..A. mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, representative Adam Schiff, billionaire Tom Steyer and former U.S Attorney General Janet Marino were all mulling a run for the vacancy. But Kamala was the first to announce and was the immediate frontrunner. However, as she entered the race, a controversy was brewing for the candidate.
On the same day that Barbara Boxer announced her retirement. A case was being heard at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that was about to put a spotlight on the criminal justice of Kamala Harris.
The other thing that I think is really important to point out here about Kamala Harris in particular, is to contrast the Gage case with another case called Johnny Baca.
That's Laura Bazelon from earlier in the series.
And in that case, there was also significant prosecutorial misconduct and there was a ninth circuit oral argument.
The case that Laura is referring to is that of Johnny Baca, a man convicted for a murder-for-hire double homicide. On the same day of Barbara Boxer's retirement announcement, Johnny Baca's case reached the Ninth Circuit, where his lawyer was asking for a retrial. A California prosecutor in Baca's initial trial was caught lying, and his testimony played a key role in Baca's guilty verdict.
In 1995, a gay couple was murdered in Riverside County. Johnny Baca, who was working as a housekeeper for the couple, was arrested for the murders while he was awaiting trial. His bunkmate in a Riverside County jail claimed that Baca confessed to him that the adopted son of the couple hired Baca to kill them in exchange for part of their life insurance money. The informant testified against Baca and also claimed on the stand that he received no favors for his testimony. A California prosecutor corroborated that claim, but it was later discovered that both the informant and the prosecutor lied.
The informant was given a reduced sentence for his testimony. Some legal experts that analyzed the case concluded that Baca would not have been convicted without the testimony of the informant. When the case reached the ninth circuit on the day Barbara Boxer announced she wasn't seeking re-election, Attorney General Kamala Harris Office was arguing that, even with the prosecutor's lie, Johnny Baca should still be denied a retrial. The Ninth Circuit panel of judges excoriated the deputy attorney general working for Kamala.
So the thing that's so troubling about this case is it's the kind of thing that makes you feel that the trial was fundamentally unfair.
When you have a prosecutor, get up, vouch for a witness who's lying. the courts have said he lied. I mean, it just seems so fundamentally unfair.
It was improper, and I don't dispute that.
Is that the practice of the Riverside County prosecutor to put on prosecutors who lie? And then that's okay, because we have this other evidence.
I don't think it's proper, your honor, and I hope that I made that clear when I began this argument. And I think it's clear that the California courts have not concluded, not reassuring that they have taken those steps. I mean, you would think that if they find out about it court of appeal, opinion and the magistrate, you know, they would be up in arms. And they would have done something about it to show that this is an aberration. But the total silence on this suggests that this is sort of the way it's done and they got caught this time. But they're going to keep doing it because they have state judges who are willing to look the other way. It's not a reassuring picture.
And in that case, the judge on the ninth circuit who was presiding was a very famous judge, and he lacerated the deputy attorney general.
Let me put it in somewhat different terms. You work for the attorney general, right? I do your honor, okay, and the attorney general may prosecute, correct your honor —.has authority to do that.
Correct your honor now. Is the attorney general aware of the situation? The attorney general is not? my supervisor is I'm not interested in—there's only one attorney general.
Okay, attorney general, aware of the situation, I have provided no report to the Attorney general. You will provide this information to her in the next 48 hours.
I will your honor.
Okay, have any steps been taken to show that California does not condone prosecutors getting on the stand and lying to their jury in a criminal case? Anything like that happened in this case. Your honor, yes, in this case.
I guess my answer is, I suppose, other than the criticism from the Court of appeal, the answer to that is no. Well, the court of appeal does not work for the Attorney general, right, correct? Okay, so anybody from the Attorney General has any? —Is there any idea? To prosecutors across the state that if you get on the stand and lie about it and get caught? You are going to have to deal with the attorney general and the possible prosecution for perjury?
Anything like that that has not happened, although, as I said earlier, I do not believe any particular reason why that has not happened. The Court of Appeal Have you done an investigation? have you sent out? —?I mean, normally, when you have a crime, a potential crime, you send investigators.
You talk to people, you take evidence.
I have not done that.
Have you done that? I have not. you have the authority to do that. do you? not? my office does, with the approval of your supervisor.
Yes, and she also has prosecutorial discretion, so we could,—without question, we have the authority to do those things.
Can I just ask him one more—one question? This really troubles me about this case. It reminds me of Tommy Thompson. The prosecution pursued a theory of murder for hire under the theory that Tom hired Baca.
Right?
That is correct, your honor.
Well, how come, Tom?—Was Tom ever prosecuted?
The answer to that question appears to be no. I can find no record of it.
It is completely inexplicable to me that he would,—I mean, he would be the principal in this murder for hire thing. Unless it was a totally fabricated theory that the jailhouse niche made up along with the prosecutor.
I have no explanation for it, I don't know.
Talk to the attorney general, okay?
Get her attention. I will do talk to the attorney general and make sure she understands the gravity of the situation and understand that we take it very seriously. I will do very seriously. It does not speak well—does not speak well for the prosecutors in California, it doesn't speak well for the Riverside County DA's office and speaks very poorly for the Attorney General's office.
At the time, the ninth Circuit had just started to livestream their oral arguments on YouTube.
And the argument went viral in the sense that tens of thousands of people watched it, which legally is a big deal.
The video began to spread right around the time that Kamala Harris entered the race for California senator in the midst of the turmoil. Instead of announcing her candidacy in front of the press, Kamala chose to quietly launch her campaign through a Facebook post. A few days later, the Los Angeles Times published a scathing piece about the prosecutorial misconduct of California and placed the blame on the doorstep of the attorney general.
And it was extremely embarrassing to Kamala Harris, and it made news, it made national news. And she relented, and she agreed to drop the case, and Johnny Baca got a retrial.
The reaction of the ninth circuit forced a response from Kamala Harris.
Her office stating that in the interest of justice, the people have concluded that the conviction should be set aside. Painting herself as a criminal justice reformer for years, and now, having suffered this national embarrassment, the U.S Senate candidate could not afford another case undermining her reputation. So when George Gage's case hit the ninth circuit, three months after the Baca case, it had the potential to be another blow to the ambitious Democrat attorney. However, unlike Johnny Baca, George Gage's ninth circuit oral argument was lacking a key ingredient.
But in George Gage's case, he didn't have a celebrity judge, and not that many people watched the argument. And so the political stakes for Harris and for her office just weren't that high. And even though, in my opinion, the evidence that George Gage is innocent is far more compelling than the evidence that Johnny Baca is innocent. It was Johnny Baca who got the relief that he deserved, and not George Gage. I did the work of significantly reforming the criminal justice system.
Kamala Harris has always claimed to be a criminal justice reformer, but when it counted. When? The ninth circuit panel of judges expressed a real concern for the validity of George Gage's conviction and sent the case back to Kamala Harris's office for mediation, she quietly refused to act. George Gage's attorney, Tony Fermani, hit their roadblock.
And then the court took this extraordinary step of sending it to mediation. And there's no stronger signal of a court saying we want you to make this case go away than directing the parties to mediation. So at that point, it really was in the Attorney General's court to do the right thing.
But she didn't do the right thing her office wouldn't release the evidence. George's chances for a retrial vanished. Kamala Harris wasn't the only ambitious lawyer seeking power that failed George Gage at the time of his trial. Prosecutor Estes was in the middle of an election to become a judge in the Los Angeles Superior Court.
His opponent was a 49-year-old attorney who'd practiced law for two decades. Estes had only been a lawyer for eight years as George's trial commenced in February 2000. The prosecutor's election to become a judge was being branded by local media as a tight judicial contest. Estes was positioned as a tough prosecutor in a politically conservative part of southern California. That meant that losing a decision against an alleged child molester would have been an electoral gift to his opponent right before the public vote.
So there was definitely a strong incentive for estes to win the trial at all costs.
The jury convicted George Gage on March 2, 2000, and on March 7, 2000, so five days later, he won his judicial election. So I think that that timing is certainly interesting.
I asked Tony why Estes didn't turn over the evidence during the trial. I mean, because he's a state prosecutor that's supposed to be pursuing justice, right? Why would he have not turned that over, though, because he would have lost the case, but why would that matter?
Why would that matter? Because he was becoming a judge and prosecutors they like to win.
They don't like to lose.
It's very, very demeaning when they lose a case.
They have their reputation.
It's harder for them to become judges number one, you know?
Even if it's an innocent man, even if it's an innocent man, they do it all the time.
They do it all the time, even if it's an innocent man.
And that's just the way they are, they don't care.
They care about winning.
To them, winning is the number one goal, and this is exactly what Christopher Estes did is he was becoming a judge. For many people seeking power, the truth is an afterthought. Nothing can get in the way of their reputation. Winning is all that matters.
The system failed George all along the way. California authorities failed him by moving forward with the prosecution. Christopher Estes failed him by withholding Marion's psychiatric records. George's public defender failed him by being an all-around crappy lawyer. Judge Koppel even failed him by not ensuring the jury received all the relevant evidence.
And when George Gage's case reached Kamala Harris's office in a properly functioning system, she should have corrected all of these failings, released the evidence and allowed a retrial. But George's case was never going to pass this ambitious lawyer. Because it was not only an immediate threat to her political chances, it also revealed an ugly truth, one that damaged a narrative that people like Kamala Harris had been carefully crafting since at least 1991..
It has everything you need to know about your physical and mental health. Personally, I'm overwhelmed by the wellness industry. I mean, there's so much information out there about lifting, weights, pelvic floors, cold plunges, anti-aging. So I launched Body and Soul to share doctor-approved insights about all of that and more. We're tackling everything.
Serums to use through menopause, exercises that improve your brain health and how to naturally lower your blood pressure and cholesterol. Oh, and if you're as sore as I am from Pickleball, we'll help you with that too. Most importantly, it's information you can trust. Everything is vetted by experts at the top of their field, and you can write into them directly to have your questions answered. So sign up for Body and Soul at katiecouric..com slash bodyandsoul.
Taking better care of yourself is just a click away.
I'm Jacob Goldstein. I used to host a show called Planet Money. Now I'm starting a new show. It's called What's your Problem? every week on What's Your Problem? Entrepreneurs and engineers describe the future they're going to build.
Once they solve a few problems, how do you build a drone delivery business from scratch? Our customers, they want us to do this unbelievably reliably in the storms, no matter what, hundreds of times a day. How do you turn a wild dream about a new kind of biology into a $10 billion company?
We didn't have a particular technology.
We didn't have a way of making money.
It was a great way to start a company.
I highly recommend it. What could go wrong? How do you sell millions of dollars worth of dog ramps for wiener dogs in the middle of a pandemic?
We're working with 400 influencers and the majority of them are actually not a person, but it's actually a dog.
I can tell you right now, the Dog Ramp guy has some very interesting problems. Listen to What's Your Problem? on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
My name is Michael Wolff and I'm the host of Fire Fury the podcast. Not too long ago, I saw Donald Trump and he shouted, Hey Michael, I made you rich. And the truth is, my three books about Trump, they have sold a lot of copies. It all started eight years ago. I found myself in Donald Trump's Beverly Hills home, sharing Häagen-dazs ice cream with him.
I asked him, Why was he running for president? and he answered without missing a beat, because I want to be the most famous man in the world. Since then, I've become a go-to person when Trump and those around him want to talk. And now every week, I'm going to share those insider stories with you. Listen to Fire Fury The podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Welcome back. So, a big reason why George Gage's case may not have applied the same pressure to Kamala Harris as Johnny Baca's case did, was because it severely undermined a movement. To believe George Gage is innocent, you also have to believe his accuser, Marion, fabricated the allegations against him. This goes against a powerful political narrative that has been crafted since the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court.
When Anita Hill accused Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment during his confirmation process, a powerful political weapon was born.
Can you tell the committee what was the most embarrassing of all the incidences that you have alleged?
I think the one that was the most embarrassing was his discussion of.
Pornography involving these women with large breasts and engaged in variety of sex with different people or animals. That was the thing that embarrassed me the most and made me feel the most humiliated.
GARY Anything you'd like to say, Senator? I would like to start by saying, unequivocally, uncategorically, that I deny each and every single allegation against me today. That suggested, in any way, that I had conversations.
Of a sexual nature or about pornographic material with Anita Hill that I ever attempted to date her?
That I ever had any personal sexual interest in her, or that I in any way ever harassed her? And from my standpoint as a Black American, as far as I'm concerned, it is a high-tech lynching.
From that day forward, the public was told that we must believe all allegations of sexual assault made by a woman. Of course, pseudo-research supporting this claim followed, and the research was used against George Gage in his trial. You may recall that the prosecution used a last-minute medical expert named Nurse Ware. In the course of her testimony, she delivered a line that likely sealed George's fate. When asked by Judge Koppel the percentage of people she examined that were not sexually abused, Nurse Ware responded saying Quote. That's pretty low because we know that 98 of the time. According to the research, when a child reports sexual abuse, it has occurred. And we may not find anything on the exam, but that doesn't mean that it didn't occur. End quote.
Several recent studies have shown this claim to be profoundly exaggerated, with some studies showing 8, 26, and even 40 of all sexual assault claims being false. The nature of sexual assaults, often a case of he-said-she-said with no physical evidence or witnesses, means the rate of false accusations is scientifically unknowable. And, regardless, broad statistics shouldn't be used as evidence to indict an individual. The facts of the particular case are all that should matter. Nevertheless, the jury in George Gage's case heard that nearly everyone, a whopping 98 accused of sexual assault, are guilty of the crime.
It must have been incredibly damaging testimony against George Gage's defense because it removed the presumption of innocence. Combine that with Prosecutor Estes withholding evidence that destroyed the credibility of his accuser. George was destined to be found guilty, whether he was or not, by the time his case reached. Kamala Harris. The believe-all-women narrative had become a powerful meme within the Democrat party, just a few months after Kamala Harris's office refused to release the evidence George Gage was requesting. The Democrat presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton tweeted Quote Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported. End quote. So anything that countered that narrative simply could not be given oxygen.
Let's be honest here, George made a mistake. He was unfaithful, and even before the trial, he paid a hefty price for that indiscretion. He lost his house and his family.
But his adultery was between him, his wife and God. It should not have led to a 70-year sentence for a crime he did not commit. Christopher Estes and then Kamala Harris were supposed to be the fail-safe in the system, but their ambitions got in the way and justice was not served.
With those two in his path, George Gage never really stood a chance.
I recently asked George why he decided to not take a plea deal.
And that's why I didn't take the plea deal.
If you didn't catch that, what George meant to say was what Marion said he did, he did not do. That's why he didn't take the plea deal. He also believed at the time that the court system was supposed to be fair and that there had to actually be evidence for him to be found guilty. But that was not the case.
But then I didn't understand how the court system go, I thought the court system was fair.
I'm not going to go by the truth.
But they make up all kinds of things. Otherwise, I would have taken the plea deal.
And I was sorry, I didn't.
Because if I did, I wouldn't be in here now for another 21 years.
Yeah, so part of you regrets not taking the plea deal.
Yeah, I thought they were fair.
They don't.
You know, I think they go by evidence.
But I get to find out they don't have to have evidence to find you guilty.
Do you have any hope that you will get released someday?
Yeah.
I think, so, do you think about that a lot?
Yeah.
Well, if I live, if I live long enough, within four years from now, they might release me, and I'll be paroled if I live long enough.
While George Gage eventually faced the parole board in January 2024, his life was in their hands.
Hi everyone, it's me Katie Couric. If you follow me on social media, you know I love to cook. Or at least try, especially alongside some of my favorite chefs and foodies like Benny Blanco, Jake Cohen, Lighty Hoyt, Alison Roman and, of course, Ina Garten and Martha Stewart. So I started a free newsletter called Good Taste that comes out every Thursday, and it's serving up recipes that will make your mouth water.
Think a candied bacon, bloody mary tacos with cabbage slaw, curry, cauliflower with almonds and mint, and cherry slab pie with vanilla ice cream to top it all off. I mean, yum, I'm getting hungry. But if you're not sold yet. We also have kitchen tips, like a foolproof way to grill the perfect burger, and must-have products like the best cast iron skillet.
To feel like a chef in your own kitchen, all you need to do is sign up at katiecouric.com. Slash Goodtaste that's k-a-t-i-e-c-o-u-r-i-c dot com slash goodtaste. I promise your taste buds will be happy you did.
I'm Jacob Goldstein. I used to host a show called Planet Money. Now I'm starting a new show. It's called What's your Problem? every week on What's Your Problem?
Entrepreneurs and engineers describe the future they're going to build once they solve a few problems. How do you build a drone delivery business from scratch? Our customers, they want us to do this unbelievably, reliably, in the storms, no matter what, and hundreds of times a day. How do you turn a wild dream about a new kind of biology into a $10 billion company?
We didn't have a particular technology.
We didn't have a way of making money.
It was a great way to start a company.
I highly recommend it.
How do you sell millions of dollars worth of dog ramps for wiener dogs in the middle of a pandemic?
We're working with 400 influencers and the majority of them are actually not a person, but it's actually a dog.
I can tell you right now, the Dog Ramp guy has some very interesting problems. Listen to What's Your Problem? on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
My name is Michael Wolff and I'm the host of Fire Fury the podcast. Not too long ago, I saw Donald Trump and he shouted, Hey Michael, I made you rich. And the truth is, my three books about Trump, they have sold a lot of copies. It all started eight years ago. I found myself in Donald Trump's Beverly Hills home, sharing Häagen-dazs ice cream with him.
I asked him, Why was he running for president? and he answered without missing a beat, because I want to be the most famous man in the world. Since then, I've become a go-to person when Trump and those around him want to talk. And now every week, I'm going to share those insider stories with you. Listen to Fire Fury The podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Do you want to hear Red Pilled America stories ad-free? Then become a backstage subscriber? Just log on to Redpilledamerica..com and click Join in the top menu. Join today and help us save America, one story at a time.
Welcome back to red Pilled America. So George Gage eventually faced the Parole Board in January 2024. After 25 years in prison. He was granted parole. George was 85 years old.
And that brings us back to the question that started this entire series Can we tell when someone is lying?
George was actually asked to take a lie detector test after he was arrested, but he refused the polygraph. I asked him why? Because when I was in Texas, I went to work in a nuclear powerhouse. You have to get a polygraph test to work in a nuclear powerhouse, and I couldn't pass it. And I don't know why.
So they tell me it was not going to pass it because of my emotions. George learned that because of the hazards of working at a nuclear power plant. The lie detector test was designed to find out if a prospective employee was using drugs.
I never used drugs in my life.
So I didn't have no problems.
And I could pass the polygraph test.
And there was nothing for me to be scared about.
Because of that, I said, I'm not going to take it.
In his eyes, he was telling the truth, yet the polygraph said he was lying, so because of that, George decided not to take the test when he was arrested. You may remember, at the beginning of this series, we asked if people could spot a fibber. Do you think that you can tell when someone is lying?
I think you can, yes.
Can you tell if someone's lying?
Uh, yeah, yeah, I think I can tell if I'm looking at them with their body language, yes.
Yeah, I think I can tell when people are lying.
Yes, yeah, yes, I mean, I have been fooled like anybody else, but I do think I can.
All but one said yes, because we all think we have an inner lie detector. But then I asked that same group, a different question Have you ever been telling the truth and somebody did not believe you?
Yes.
Oh yeah.
Oh yeah.
Me too, you too.
I feel like there's been times where I've told the truth and people were still skeptical.
Have you ever been telling the truth to somebody and them not believe you?
Yes.
Uh, yeah.
I think so, yes.
Sure, it's happened.
Have you ever been telling the truth to somebody and them not believe you?
Yes, absolutely.
The truth is, we really can't tell if someone is lying.
Our internal lie detectors are important mechanisms to help us with everyday decisions.
Decisions on who to associate with, who to trust and who to avoid. But when it comes to making big decisions, we have to rely on evidence. Because if we foster a society of feelings over facts when deciding a person's fate, innocent men and women will suffer for crimes they never committed.
We need to know, are we about to put somebody on the United States Supreme Court who committed a sexual assault? Senator Harris? This is a classic, he said. She said Case somebody isn't telling the truth.
What is your process to determine who's telling the truth here?
It comes down to credibility, to your point, Gail, and it's going to be about listening to what each party has to say. But I believe her.
Ventures. Now, our entire archive of episodes is only available to our backstage subscribers. To subscribe, visit redpilledamerica..com and click Support at the top of the menu. That's redpilledamerica..com and click Support at the top of the menu. Thanks for listening.
Hi.
Everybody, it's Katie Couric. Have you heard about my newsletter? Called Body Soul? It has everything you need to know about health and wellness, from skincare and serums to meditation and brain health. We've got you covered. And most importantly, it's information you can trust.
Everything is vetted by experts at the top of their field. Just sign up at katiecouric.com slash bodyandsoul that's k-a-t-i-e-c-o-u-r-i-c dot com slash bodyandsoul. I promise you'll be happier and healthier if you do.
I'm Jacob Goldstein. I used to host Planet Money. Now I'm starting a new show. It's called What's Your Problem? every week on What's Your Problem. Entrepreneurs and engineers describe the future they're going to build.
Once they solve a few problems, I'm talking to people, trying to figure out how to do things that no one on the planet knows how to do. From creating a drone delivery business to building a car that can truly drive itself. Listen to What's Your Problem? on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
My name is Michael Wolff. Each week on Fire and Fury, the podcast, I take you deeper into the mind of Donald Trump and his campaign than any other journalist ever goes. I've written three books on Trump. But for some reason, the people around him, they keep on talking to me to find out what they tell me. Listen to Fire and Fury the podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
v1.0.0.241120-1_os