voice2text-logo

Vance Vance Revolution

2024-07-18 00:40:30

Pod Save America is a no-bullshit conversation about politics hosted by former Obama aides Jon Favreau, Jon Lovett, Dan Pfeiffer, and Tommy Vietor. It cuts through the noise to break down the week’s news and helps people figure out what matters and how they can help. They’re regularly joined by journalists, activists, politicians, entertainers, and world leaders. You can watch on YouTube or listen to new episodes every Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. Ad-Free Pod Save America episodes available NOW through Friends of the Pod subscription. Head to crooked.com/friends to join today! For a transcript of an episode of Pod Save America, please email transcripts@crooked.com (edited)

1
Speaker 1
[00:19.78 - 00:23.76]

Welcome to Positive America. I'm Jon Favreau. I'm Jon Lovett. I'm Dan Pfeiffer. I'm Tommy Vitor.

[00:23.96 - 00:38.14]

We're recording this on Wednesday night in beautiful Milwaukee, site of the Republican National Convention. We're going to be leaving soon for Charlie Kirk's after party in the name of unity. I didn't get invited to that one. It's unity. You didn't get invited.

[00:38.26 - 00:39.62]

We're all Ben Shapiro's plus four.

[00:42.04 - 00:44.34]

But before we go, we're going to talk about J.

[00:44.34 - 01:07.22]

D. Vance's big speech and the rest of the highlights from night three of the RNC. We also find out today that the DNC blinked in the standoff over whether to rush a virtual roll call vote to officially nominate Joe Biden, who was supposed to be campaigning in Nevada today, until he tested positive for covid. A poor guy can't catch a single break. Also, all kinds of reporting about Pelosi, Schumer.

[01:07.98 - 01:13.64]

They're all. they're all shown in bad polls. They're all shown in bad polls. All the yeah. So we'll see.

[01:13.70 - 01:23.16]

We're going to talk about that later. But first, we just watched J.D. Vance's speech here in a hotel room together, which is now how we watch all political performances. We'd like to forget.

[01:24.68 - 01:28.34]

So we do. We go to a hotel, watch it. It's now the second worst time I've had in a hotel.

2
Speaker 2
[01:28.34 - 01:35.90]

with you boys recently. I don't want to talk about the worst. So there's also Biden's speech.

1
Speaker 1
[01:37.66 - 01:45.54]

So Vance's speech was about 45 minutes. It felt like an hour. Yeah, it felt like an hour, felt longer. There was some. there was a lot of his bio.

[01:46.10 - 02:01.74]

There was a lot of economic populism. There was a lot of Trump worship, but not necessarily in that order. Not really in any order. But we do have some highlights. The first one is he started off the speech talking about Trump and the assassination attempt on Donald Trump.

[02:01.98 - 02:24.94]

I want all Americans to go and watch the video of a would-be assassin coming a quarter of an inch from taking his life. Consider the lies they told you about Donald Trump and then look at that photo of him, defiant, fist in the air. When Donald Trump rose to his feet in that Pennsylvania field, all of America stood with him.

[02:27.08 - 02:47.80]

I just wanted to play that one, because it really made me mad that he is still. we talked yesterday about his tweet after the assassination attempt, where he basically blamed Joe Biden's rhetoric for the assassination attempt. This was think about all the lies they told about Trump. And now think about him putting his fist in the air after the assassin's bullet. he and other speakers have done this.

[02:47.96 - 03:14.10]

There's been a lot of. they tried to kill him this week. They, when we're finding out more about the shooter, the FBI, found his phone. In the phone, he was searching for Biden events, Trump events, date of the DNC, date of Trump rallies. It seems other officials, other officials, Merrick Garland does seem so far like this is a kid who hated politicians and was clearly disturbed.

[03:14.60 - 03:22.02]

And yet this whole art Republican convention. And then again, with JD Vance, there is this, they want to connect it somehow to Trump. That just really.

4
Speaker 4
[03:22.02 - 03:32.78]

pissed me off. I don't know what you guys, well, he said. he, his whole line, JD's line, was. Trump called for national unity right after an assassin tried to take his life. And okay, sure.

[03:32.78 - 04:01.10]

But you pointed the finger and you were saying things on Twitter that were essentially incitement, saying that Joe Biden's rhetoric is the reason Donald Trump got shot, with no information, no evidence, just because I don't, I assume, probably because you're a right-wing hack and you desperately wanted to get named the vice presidential nominee. And you knew that kind of outrageous attack, dog shit would get you noticed by the Trump team. Yeah. Well, so then, after he did his,

1
Speaker 1
[04:01.28 - 04:42.06]

uh, a couple of minutes of Trump worship at the top, and then he finally got to his bio and sort of his message of, you know, he's trying out this sort of the mega version of economic populism. Uh, let's listen. We need a leader who's not in the pocket of big business, but answers to the working man, union and non-union alike, a leader who won't sell out to multinational corporations, but we'll stand up for American companies and American industry. The people who govern this country have failed and failed again. We're working class boy, born far from the halls of power, can stand on this stage as the next vice president of the United States of America.

[04:44.08 - 04:49.34]

All right. So love it. What'd you think of the speech? So I think a sign of a.

2
Speaker 2
[04:49.34 - 05:13.44]

bad speech is you're not sure, it's over till he just stops talking that I really had absolutely, cause. it was, it was a couple of different endings, a couple of different endings. It, it really circles back. He, he hits the bio a lot in the speech, but not in a way that that's particularly effective, because the speech was so poorly structured. It starts with a whole section of just, you know, pledging fealty to Trump and all that is good about Trump.

[05:13.50 - 05:23.76]

Then he gets into his bio, with, which was, I think, probably the strongest part of the speech, which is walking through his bio while talking about all the different policy positions Biden has taken.

1
Speaker 1
[05:23.76 - 05:37.66]

that, that he views as being wrong. Yeah. He did this riff where he said, you know, when I was in fourth grade, Biden supported NAFTA and NAFTA, you know, a lot of jobs left where I'm from and all across the Midwest. When I was in high school, buying gave China.

2
Speaker 2
[05:37.66 - 05:42.24]

sweetheart trade deal voted for it. When I was in college, the, he supported the war in Iraq,

1
Speaker 1
[05:42.34 - 05:50.26]

the war in Iraq, you know, so then there was jobs sent overseas, kids sent overseas to die. And then he said, you know, basically the Biden was wrong on all these issues. Trump was right.

2
Speaker 2
[05:50.26 - 06:17.04]

on all these issues, even back then. Right. So I think that was like, if that, if you were to take one section of the speech, I feel like that was like probably the part that I thought was the strongest. And I bet what we'll hear on the stump too, it felt like the start of a stump speech, but the problem is it was in the middle of a meandering and hard to follow speech with a lot of, a lot of lines, a lot of rhetoric, a lot of long pauses for applause that I felt like didn't really land. Like none of it really land landed that hard.

[06:17.14 - 06:33.06]

Even the bio, I felt like this is, he has an incredibly compelling stories on the ticket. because of that story. You would think you would start with that story and use it to kind of frame the entire speech, but it felt really cobbled together, which was relief. That's my feeling about it. It was strategic idiocy.

[06:33.32 - 06:33.52]

The.

3
Speaker 3
[06:33.52 - 06:38.50]

speech was, it was terrible. This is the, no one knows about JD Vance. I know he had a bestselling.

1
Speaker 1
[06:38.50 - 06:43.32]

book, but not that many people read it. You know, yeah. Who knows about that? Elite broadcasters.

3
Speaker 3
[06:43.82 - 06:51.98]

Exactly. He had, he had. a movie was made of his, of his book. Almost no one watched it. And this is his one chance.

[06:52.06 - 07:05.20]

There'll probably be about 12 to 15 million people watching this tonight. It will be seen. The clips will be seen by more people. You chance you stand up there and introduce yourself to the nation, right? The VP generally doesn't matter that much, but it's going to matter more in a campaign where the candidate is 78 years old.

[07:05.46 - 07:16.62]

And so this was his chance to do it. He failed miserably at what should have been absolutely up. He, the only reason he's on this age is he has a compelling personal story and tells it well. And he did not do that. His story is mixed up into a bunch of different places.

[07:16.82 - 07:40.96]

There's no coherence to it. And you have to credential yourself with your story before you make all the attacks. Like, I think, the Joe, but the high school, middle school, Joe Biden thing, it's a, it's a clever way to get at Joe Biden's age and separate him from working class voters. But you have to tell your story first, but he was confused because they were so enamored with the fourth grade high school college line that they made it the story instead of telling the actual story. It was terrible.

[07:41.66 - 07:52.04]

It was, I'm, and I am shocked it was so terrible. We were at dinner before this and I was like, this is going to be a great speech. Yeah. We were all very worried about the speech. The easiest thing in the world for him to do because his delivery was fine.

[07:52.14 - 07:59.78]

Some people have a good story, but they can't tell it. His delivery was totally fine. It was the speech. It was fine. He gave a, he sounded, I wrote this

1
Speaker 1
[07:59.78 - 08:16.58]

note down. He, he wrote a book. He's been on the book circuit tour. He's been on the, probably had Speaker's Bureau before he was in Congress, did the speaking tour. He sounds like someone who's just been talking to, like too many crowds of CEOs, other people, random organizations about his book.

[08:16.64 - 08:21.54]

Like he didn't actually have the cadence that you need in a convention hall. He didn't. And like,

2
Speaker 2
[08:21.56 - 08:38.98]

he was waiting for the applause. The applause kills me. They never built, they don't build anything because they just let the applause die down and then start up again. Like when Obama delivers his version of this speech, which was obviously famously far better. He's like, rising through these moments and, and, and like building to something.

4
Speaker 4
[08:39.14 - 08:57.10]

That was a big point in speech prep in 2004 was you have to ride the applause. Don't stop. Talk over it, because it, you know, it might sound loud in the hall, but at home they will be able to hear you. This time it was, it was the reverse. You almost couldn't hear the applause at home, but JD was pausing and sort of awkwardly waving to everybody, and it just didn't work.

[08:57.50 - 09:12.08]

And yeah, the, the bio has to be your, your anchor. that explains who you are and informs your belief and gives you credibility. And he just didn't do it. There were also, just like, it jumped all over the place. There was a point where he did this very corny thing, where he talked about his three kids back home.

[09:12.14 - 09:17.42]

And if you're watching, daddy says, put your butts in bed. And then he immediately did a hard pivot to fentanyl overdoses.

2
Speaker 2
[09:17.64 - 09:19.68]

I guess that's probably why I took the time to turn the TV off.

4
Speaker 4
[09:20.84 - 09:22.06]

I was like, how did we get here?

2
Speaker 2
[09:24.16 - 09:34.24]

Now, it's like such a cliche, even in like Emmy award speeches, like, all right, mommy won. Now go to bed. Daddy says, go to bed. Like, how are you saying it out loud? This is an incredible feat.

1
Speaker 1
[09:34.40 - 10:01.42]

Process-wise, one guess as to what might've happened is the speech writers wrote a speech that they needed to have for whoever the nominee was. And then, once they found out it was JD Vance, then you insert JD's story into the Trump messaging speech, and then the assassination attempt happens. So then you add that topper in. So now you've got an assassination attempt topper into your bio, into the Trump worship.

2
Speaker 2
[10:01.94 - 10:09.90]

Classic structure. By the way, this was my prediction for the Trump speech, that there would just be larded up toppers, which is so far happening.

1
Speaker 1
[10:10.04 - 10:44.36]

But just substance-wise too, I think it's interesting that all of the issues that the Republican party and Donald Trump have vulnerabilities on in this election, abortion, election denial, sort of all kinds of extremism, with the exception of immigration, which is sort core to Donald Trump's political philosophy. Weird word to say. Donald Trump's politics, and JD Vance's as well. And sort of this trying to present themselves as economic populists, even though they want to give tax cuts to rich people and deregulate everything. Those were the two main issues.

[10:44.54 - 10:50.32]

None of the other issues that really trip up Republicans, you heard in this speech as much tonight.

2
Speaker 2
[10:50.40 - 10:59.30]

Yeah. When they get to the working class politics, it's all just vibes, right? It's just. they're doing working class vibes. They're talking about immigration.

[10:59.62 - 11:00.68]

They don't mention the corporate tax cut.

1
Speaker 1
[11:00.90 - 11:01.62]

The ruling class.

2
Speaker 2
[11:01.70 - 11:02.68]

They mention the ruling class.

1
Speaker 1
[11:02.96 - 11:03.46]

The ruling class has ruined everything.

2
Speaker 2
[11:03.70 - 11:05.14]

Never actually policies on that.

4
Speaker 4
[11:05.20 - 11:07.96]

This is a real liberal elite comment or thing to notice.

2
Speaker 2
[11:08.12 - 11:08.58]

Oh, I can't wait.

4
Speaker 4
[11:09.58 - 11:28.50]

It's just always striking to me that a speech that can begin with a long intro about an assassination attempt, ends up at a place where you're bragging about your grandmother having 19 loaded guns in the house. And no one kind of sees the weirdness there, the disconnect between maybe our gun fetish in this country is part of the problem, not a thing we're proud of.

2
Speaker 2
[11:28.58 - 11:42.26]

I'll tell you what my reaction to that was, which is also like my recollection of the book is. it's a lot about how this kind of grievance and sense of being under threat is a way of avoiding facing up to the real problems.

4
Speaker 4
[11:42.52 - 11:46.08]

He's very hard on his community. It's not understanding. It's super harsh.

2
Speaker 2
[11:46.34 - 11:55.04]

And that's why that book became a liberal darling, because it was actually like kind of being honest about the ways these places were supposed to be responsible for what had happened.

1
Speaker 1
[12:06.62 - 12:24.58]

So we have had now a full day or two to digest all the JD Vance takes our eyeballs could handle. One notable subplot is that the Republican national security establishment isn't too happy with Vance's isolationist views, especially on Ukraine. That did not come up tonight. I don't believe he talked about Ukraine tonight.

3
Speaker 3
[12:24.80 - 12:27.64]

He made a reference to the big tent on national security issues.

2
Speaker 2
[12:27.78 - 12:30.22]

And America first, a lot of America first talk.

1
Speaker 1
[12:30.26 - 12:32.32]

Right, but sort of yada yada over Ukraine.

4
Speaker 4
[12:32.40 - 12:49.32]

Yeah, I mean, he lied about Donald Trump opposing the war in Iraq, even though last month, in an interview with Ross Douthat in the New York Times, JD Vance admitted that actually, in 2003,, Trump said something that said he supported the invasion of Iraq. So JD, again, a month ago, said he knew Trump was full of shit on that front. And then tonight,

1
Speaker 1
[12:49.72 - 13:09.38]

gave him credit for it. And apparently big, some big Republican donors aren't too thrilled with his protectionist views, though they probably like that. Democrats are also pushing around videos of Vance saying he wants a national abortion ban. He said that in 2022,. there was also a clip of him on Tucker Carlson, where he said that we're, we're being ruled by a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable with their own lives.

2
Speaker 2
[13:09.64 - 13:11.92]

I remember when that happened. I remember that clip.

1
Speaker 1
[13:12.14 - 13:32.84]

He really has this like, he's had this like real hard edge over the last couple years, unlike Tucker and some other speeches that you're like, anything else stand out to you guys, since Vance was announced, that has made you either think he'll be, he'll be, valuable to the Trump campaign this way, or, oh, actually he's going to be, this is a real vulnerability. Now the Democrats can exploit Dan. What do you think?

3
Speaker 3
[13:32.98 - 13:56.82]

I think that the whole discourse has probably overstated. I mean, the vice president generally doesn't matter very much. Now you can absolutely fuck it up. Like John McCain did with Sarah Palin, and which is, but then it's not really about the vice president, it's about what the vice presidential choice says about the person who made the choice. You know, the idea that they're going to park him in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and he's going to be some sort of Rust Belt ambassador for Trump.

1
Speaker 1
[13:56.96 - 13:57.90]

And he said all the states.

3
Speaker 3
[13:58.02 - 13:59.06]

He said, he kept saying him over again.

1
Speaker 1
[13:59.18 - 14:00.46]

He said all the blue wall states tonight.

3
Speaker 3
[14:00.74 - 14:32.66]

Yeah. I'm sure he'll go to those states a lot, because those are the states that if Trump wins one of those states, the election is probably over, but there's nothing in Vance's record, his performance in Ohio, his policy positions, that suggest that he has some sort of secret sauce that is going to help him with those voters, his populism, economic populism. And there's been all these annoying think pieces about how he and Josh Hawley and these cadre of Republican eggheads are coming together to try to create this policy framework around America. first, populism. It, all it is is tariffs and mass deportations.

[14:32.92 - 14:48.36]

Yeah. You know, and he does this performative bullshit where he's like, he said this in the Ross interview, where he's like, I'm more aligned with the Bernie bros and some people in my own party, but that doesn't mean anything. And he says a nice thing about Lena Kahn once. And that seemed to be, seemed to be that he's some transformative figure in Republican party. He's not.

[14:48.44 - 15:10.48]

And the reason that it all doesn't really matter is his policy positions do not matter. Donald Trump's do. And at the convention on Tuesday night, Steve Scalise, the Republican whip, stood up, or the Republican leader, I guess, stood up and said in the first hundred days, we are going to make the Trump tax cuts permanent. Right? Like that is the Trump Vance agenda, is tax cuts for the rich.

2
Speaker 2
[15:10.48 - 15:19.94]

Yeah. The sort of populism of the tax policy is hating universal childcare more than you hate a child tax credit, but trying to stop both.

1
Speaker 1
[15:20.90 - 15:22.62]

Before we move on from J.

[15:22.62 - 15:39.34]

D. Vance, it was reported that J.D. Vance reached out to vice president Kamala Harris. They had this cordial phone call, and then the Trump campaign put out a response to setting the date for the vice presidential debate between J.D. Vance and Kamala Harris.

[15:39.48 - 15:52.56]

And their statement was, we don't know who the Democrat nominee for vice president is going to be, so we can't lock in a date before their convention. To do so would be unfair to Gavin Newsom, J.B. Pritzker, Gretchen Whitmer, or whoever Kamala Harris picks as her running mates.

4
Speaker 4
[15:52.94 - 15:54.28]

Points for trolling. Yeah, they're having fun.

3
Speaker 3
[15:54.90 - 15:59.34]

Points for trolling. They're also scared, shitless, that that might be a change.

4
Speaker 4
[15:59.86 - 16:01.90]

Can I just flag one other thing that jumped out at me about J.

[16:01.90 - 16:02.14]

D.

[16:02.24 - 16:18.58]

's? I think he's so new on the stage that people are trying to figure out whether he's sincere, or was the hillbilly elegy, J.D. Vance, the real one, or is today the real one? This anecdote jumped out at me from a New York Times profile of him. So they talked to a person named Sarah Nelson, who's a former classmate of J.D.

[16:18.62 - 16:22.10]

Vance's, who's transgender, and was once close friends with both J.

[16:22.10 - 16:36.54]

D. and his wife. And Sophia Nelson recalled that J.D. delivered home-baked treats when Sophia Nelson had top surgery, and then they stopped talking. in 2021, when he started embracing these vicious laws.

[16:36.62 - 16:58.66]

There's an Arkansas bill opposing transgender care for minors. So it's clear that a few years ago, before he was in politics, J.D. Vance saw the humanity in people first, and he didn't care if you were transgender or not. He'd go to your house and bring you brownies or something, and now he is more than happy to be vicious and nasty and harm people who are his friends if it gets him on the ticket.

3
Speaker 3
[16:59.12 - 17:04.88]

He is a man driven by visible, palpable ambition and nothing else. Yeah, work for him tonight. Yeah,

2
Speaker 2
[17:04.90 - 17:24.66]

but it's funny that it's also why it's like that guy, maybe that, you know, you would never know, seeing that guy on stage, that he has that incredibly compelling story, because he is ambitious, and he did become what he needed to become to get there, and he looks much more like a tech guy in a vest at this point, doing an impression of a politician. And it speaks to actually his credit, how smart he is, and how far he came, but it doesn't make him that much of a.

3
Speaker 3
[17:24.66 - 17:29.08]

It's also why he did so poorly in the Rust Belt parts of Ohio against Tim Ryan. People can smell that.

4
Speaker 4
[17:29.08 - 17:39.02]

bullshit from a million miles away. The only time I laughed out loud tonight at all was during Usha Vance's speech, which was fine. She's J.D. Vance's wife. She seemed a little nervous.

[17:39.20 - 17:49.12]

It was sweet, but it wasn't great. But she said he had one overriding ambition, to be a husband and a father, and I literally like, I, broke out laughing, because clearly he's the most ambitious.

1
Speaker 1
[17:49.12 - 18:06.88]

person possible. 39-year-old vice presidential nominee. A few other notable speakers from tonight. Don Jr., his fiancée Kim Guilfoyle, soon-to-be-obscure-again Governor Doug Burgum, got passed over. Former Trump aide Peter Navarro, who got out of prison today after serving four months for refusing a subpoena from the January 6th committee.

[18:07.22 - 18:07.96]

Apparently brought the house down.

3
Speaker 3
[18:08.04 - 18:11.98]

Brought the house down. Many people said it was the most applause at the convention since Trump.

2
Speaker 2
[18:11.98 - 18:20.62]

walked in the room on Monday night. Love it, love it. Is this just still because, fucking, what's his name, Kushner Googled trade and came up with this book? That guy goes, anyway, sorry, what were you gonna say?

1
Speaker 1
[18:20.62 - 18:26.68]

I don't know. It was, they love a convict, you know? Yeah. And then there was... A man with convictions.

[18:27.24 - 18:39.00]

There was also a video that they played of gold star families who had lost loved ones during the.

4
Speaker 4
[18:39.00 - 19:14.26]

withdrawal from Afghanistan. Yeah, it was the families of service members who were killed at Abbey Gate in those final days of the Afghanistan withdrawal, and there was a six and a half minute pre-taped video where they talked to, you know, moms, wives, you know, sister, brothers of the families, talked about, you know, who these service members were. And then they also talked about, you know, they showed footage of President Biden at the dignified transfer ceremony at Dover, looking at his watch. They talked about how things didn't go well in the conversation with Biden and the families. And then they said in this video that...

[19:14.26 - 19:18.98]

Do you want to play a clip? Should we play the clip? Yeah, why don't we play the clip? The administration, the White House, our president?

2
Speaker 2
[19:18.98 - 19:26.82]

has never once mentioned their names, not one of them. Honestly, I don't feel like Joe Biden cared.

3
Speaker 3
[19:27.40 - 19:34.94]

He just had no empathy for us at all. I do think incompetence played a huge factor in what happened.

[19:38.16 - 19:43.54]

Bad decision, bad leadership, and it all starts at the top. Joe Biden should not be leading this.

2
Speaker 2
[19:43.54 - 19:50.96]

country. There was no point in making that hard deadline, August 31st. It was 100% a political.

3
Speaker 3
[19:50.96 - 20:00.90]

stunt. He let my son down. He let the 13 down. He let the 45 wounded down. He let those 174 civilians down.

[20:01.12 - 20:06.04]

He let our country down. And then what hurts the most is that they could be here.

4
Speaker 4
[20:07.70 - 20:36.00]

Yeah, and then, after that, the parents of the fallen came on stage and they read the names one by one. And it was, I thought, an incredibly powerful, well-done, and brutal political hit. Biden did reach out to all those families, right? Well, he met with them at Dover during the transfer of their remains back home. But I think this is that really tough scene that Jen Psaki actually writes about in her book, where I think he tried to talk to them about his loss and losing his son.

[20:36.46 - 20:46.64]

And I think that helps him connect with some of the families, but others were offended by it and didn't go. well. I'm not sure anyone can say anything that would make you feel better in.

1
Speaker 1
[20:46.64 - 21:00.94]

that moment if you just lost a loved one. So then there was Don Jr. He went up to speak. He then introduced his daughter, Kai Trump, who's much better than him. By far.

[21:01.14 - 21:10.72]

She did more to humanize Donald Trump, her grandfather, than anyone I had heard. And Don Jr. unfortunately got back on stage after she was done and continued speaking.

3
Speaker 3
[21:12.04 - 21:13.34]

Who's running things?

[21:17.88 - 21:19.40]

Does anyone really know?

[21:21.10 - 21:24.34]

Is it Jill? Is it Hunter?

[21:26.38 - 21:27.46]

Barack Obama?

[21:29.72 - 21:37.54]

Maybe it's the ghost of corn pop. Remember, Build Back Better? Instead, we got broke, bumbling Biden.

[21:39.44 - 21:43.24]

What a mistake. The corn pop thing is a real deep cut.

1
Speaker 1
[21:43.46 - 21:47.40]

I was going to say, you have to be the biggest junkie, left or right.

3
Speaker 3
[21:47.96 - 21:49.44]

That's 2019, right?

1
Speaker 1
[21:49.62 - 21:52.38]

It's also, it's a deep cut for political junkies.

2
Speaker 2
[21:52.54 - 22:02.28]

It's also logical, logical nonsense. It's not a good, it's just not, what does it mean? Oh, maybe it's corn pop. This old story he tells. It doesn't make sense on its own terms.

4
Speaker 4
[22:02.28 - 22:05.48]

A guy he argued with when he was a lifeguard in the fifties.

1
Speaker 1
[22:05.80 - 22:08.34]

Like remember Build Back Better? No, no one remembers Build Back Better.

3
Speaker 3
[22:08.40 - 22:09.44]

That's the problem, actually.

1
Speaker 1
[22:10.38 - 22:15.84]

We now call it the IRA, and no one knows what that stands for either. And nobody knows it happened and nobody will never know. Have you heard about the chips ad?

2
Speaker 2
[22:15.86 - 22:31.54]

Yeah. And then next year it'll all be turned into highway funding anyway. But Don Jr. always has the energy of just like a coked out, drunk, terrible customer at a restaurant calling a waitress sweetie. That's just sort of like his whole vibe forever.

[22:31.78 - 22:33.10]

Just the life of doing that.

4
Speaker 4
[22:33.54 - 22:54.30]

Yeah. Yeah. I mean, Donald Trump's granddaughter, Don Jr.'s daughter, 17 year old girl, talked about him as a grandfather, calling her when she's at school, talk about the golf game, like all the humanizing stuff you'd expect from a family member. And then they bring out his son and he just does this red meat screed. that was, you know, probably should have been left on rumble.com or wherever he usually does his podcast.

2
Speaker 2
[22:54.76 - 23:01.24]

Yeah. Where does he speak from? It's all, it's up here. He speaks up high. It's up high.

[23:01.48 - 23:03.14]

It's front of the throat.

4
Speaker 4
[23:03.28 - 23:08.36]

It's hard. Lines, like Teddy Roosevelt's. man in the arena has a name, and it's Donald Trump.

1
Speaker 1
[23:09.56 - 23:19.48]

I mean, every convention is of both parties, is just fucking chock, full of way too many cliches. But the last couple of days have been really, do you know, our best days are yet to come? Have you heard that?

2
Speaker 2
[23:19.54 - 23:28.58]

It's also like maybe, maybe when they made, maybe when they went through and did their unity pass on all these speeches, they took out all the good lines. I bet the division lines are probably the toughest stuff.

1
Speaker 1
[23:28.58 - 23:32.52]

Ron Johnson's got to get his old speech back. All right. We'll be right back.

[23:44.10 - 23:58.52]

All right. Let's talk about the upcoming democratic convention and Joe Biden, whose streak of luck continued today. when he tested positive for COVID right in between campaign events in Las Vegas. White House said he's got mild symptoms, no fever. We'll be isolating at home in Delaware.

[23:59.14 - 24:25.16]

Hope he gets better soon. President's also dealing with more bad political news. Just before we recorded this, ABC reported that Chuck Schumer told Biden in a meeting on Saturday that quote, it would be better for the country if he ended his reelection bid. We then learned this morning that Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries encouraged the DNC to move back the date of the virtual roll call to nominate Biden. This is what we were talking about last episode.

[24:25.38 - 25:20.14]

In response, the rules committee put out a letter today saying that the voting won't start now until August 1st. So that by some time, though, not a lot for the rapidly growing group of congressional Democrats who have publicly called on Biden to step down from the ticket. That faction officially grew by one big name today, as Adam Schiff, who we talked about yesterday as well, said publicly what he was reported to have said in private, uh, in his statement to the LA times shift praise Biden as a great president, but said, quote, I have serious concerns about whether the president can defeat Donald Trump in November and called for him to pass the torch. This all comes as a new associated press poll shows that two thirds of all democratic voters now want Joe Biden to withdraw in. a new blue labs analytics poll shows basically every other potential democratic candidate running ahead of Biden in the swing States.

[25:21.28 - 25:25.52]

Ooh, where to begin, where to begin? Uh, let's start with the Schumer news.

3
Speaker 3
[25:25.54 - 25:48.16]

Dan, you think it's as big as it seems? Yeah, I think, I think it's, it's a very big deal because there have been rumors for a long time that there's a bunch of senators who privately went Biden to step aside. Remember it was like two weeks ago, it feels like a hundred years ago, when Mark Warner was organizing a meeting that then got canceled. We only, as of right now, have two senators who've come out. Uh, well, I guess one Senator and one Senator to be shift.

[25:48.28 - 26:00.50]

And then Peter Welch of Vermont, this could lead to more. Schumer and Biden met privately on Saturday, right before the assassination attempt on Trump. So we never really got any readout on what happened in that conversation. We now know that Schumer was more direct than I think a lot of people assumed,

1
Speaker 1
[26:01.00 - 26:19.10]

you know, you know, what's interesting, though, is I'm thinking the timeline now. Schumer and Biden meet on Saturday. Biden does the Lester Holt interview Monday, in which he was no less defiant publicly about staying in. What, unless now I'm, now I'm rethinking it. Did I miss anything?

2
Speaker 2
[26:19.26 - 26:28.96]

I don't love it. What do you think? I think there's two ways to see it. One is, as we talked about in the last pod, Joe Biden has to be defiant until the very moment he's not, there's no other option. I think it is interesting.

[26:29.56 - 26:46.80]

There's this dynamic. People really want Joe Biden to make the decision. And there's an understanding that Joe Biden is a proud person and so that he won't be pushed. And so they're trying to pull him, you know, there was reporting that a lot more people were about to come forward, calling on Biden to step aside. And then the assassination attempt happened.

[26:47.30 - 27:01.22]

It was just interesting that Schumer has this meeting, Biden is defiant on Monday, and now we're getting the leak. It does seem like people are starting to come to grips with the fact that it's going to take more pushing than pulling, and they're going to have to be more public than.

4
Speaker 4
[27:01.22 - 27:20.38]

they had hoped. Yeah, I think the initial strategy was to try to have these conversations privately and politely. And now people are going public with demands, not requests. I did see that Jeff Zeleny, a great reporter at CNN, just reported that President Biden is now more receptive to the push for him to leave the ticket. He's gone from saying Kamala Harris can't win to asking if.

1
Speaker 1
[27:20.38 - 27:44.04]

Kamala Harris can win. So it does seem like senior Democratic sources saying this to Zeleny. In private conversations, he's sounding a little more receptive, even though he's not publicly. The other possibility here is that Schumer had this conversation with Biden, and Biden was not so receptive. And Schumer thought that maybe there'd be some movement on this, and there hasn't been.

[27:44.14 - 27:59.44]

And then maybe that's when it leaked to John Carl. Now, officially, Schumer's office put out a statement that was sort of a non-denial. that was like, unless the source is Chuck Schumer or Joe Biden themselves, this is just idle speculation. It's like, okay, well, could be. What a strange.

4
Speaker 4
[27:59.44 - 28:09.12]

way to introduce a new thought. And they also said that leader Schumer conveyed the views of his caucus directly to President Biden on Saturday. Not sure what that was clarifying. Yeah. And we.

1
Speaker 1
[28:09.12 - 28:23.02]

know that most of the caucus at this point, I mean, there was reporting in the caucus meeting that John Fetterman asked everyone, okay, who's actually on board with Biden? And only four senators raised their hands. Wow. That was from last week. When was J.D.

[28:23.06 - 28:23.70]

Vance in a mustache?

2
Speaker 2
[28:26.04 - 28:32.28]

And also Menendez was still there at the time. So where was he on this? Right. Yeah. Well, it depends on who makes me a better offer.

1
Speaker 1
[28:36.14 - 28:56.48]

So you got. Schumer and Jeffries were both pushing the DNC to push back the roll call vote. Nancy Pelosi is working behind the scenes to try to get Joe Biden to step aside. So it does now seem that the entire leadership of the Democratic Party is working on this. And what has ever given us.

2
Speaker 2
[28:56.48 - 29:00.60]

less hope than the entire leadership of the Democratic Party, working on something? I mean,

3
Speaker 3
[29:00.64 - 29:31.94]

I think it can mean that they are working to create a path for Biden to step down. It could also mean that, no matter what happens, the best move for the party is to handle this virtual roll call in the most transparent, fair-minded way. Because even if, Schumer, you get a different report, Schumer didn't make that case to Biden, it's still in his interest to handle the virtual roll call better, because it's going to lead to a massive uproar on the party. If you were to go with the plan, the DNC was pushing quite aggressively just 24 hours ago. Yeah.

[29:32.02 - 29:32.32]

So let's.

1
Speaker 1
[29:32.32 - 30:03.50]

talk about that. So we talked about this last night and it seemed like it could be as early as next week that they were going to start this thing. Now they're saying no voting can start until August 1st and they do want to wrap it up by August 7th, which is the sort of fake-ish deadline in Ohio, the old deadline in Ohio that we're still going with. If Biden does step aside, doesn't seem like there's much time for any kind of mini primary open convention. It's certainly there's enough time at that point.

[30:03.50 - 30:16.58]

if Biden does just endorse Kamala Harris and the party unites behind Kamala Harris, then we're off to the races. They can do the virtual roll call. She would have to pick a running mate rather quickly. Beyond that, it doesn't seem like there's a lot of time. if they're going to start voting in August.

[30:16.72 - 30:19.38]

Would they just maybe punt the whole virtual roll call?

3
Speaker 3
[30:19.38 - 30:43.70]

all together. in that scenario? I think we would either punt it all together or you would move it back. Based on everything you read and everything there are, Republicans in Ohio say, and I recognize we're taking that with a grain of salt, the odds that somehow they go back and change the rules so that Biden or some Democratic nominee can not be on the ballot in Ohio seems quite low. And it doesn't seem like that risk is not so high that you would short circuit a process to pick our new nominee.

[30:44.14 - 31:07.88]

So you can move it back. If you look at the deadlines of the other states that we talked about, like California and Washington, you can move it back a couple of weeks and either wrap it up right at the beginning of the convention, or you could wrap it up at the convention and take on, like there's no good option, right? Do you want to have a good process to pick your best nominee? Or do you want to manage the legal risks that come from low likelihood of success lawsuits, preventing ballot access? You probably want to side with.

[31:07.88 - 31:12.14]

a longer process helps you pick a better nominee with actual voting in the convention.

1
Speaker 1
[31:12.40 - 31:30.14]

Yeah. So let's talk about some of these, the polling that Biden and others woke up to this morning. So this is from blue labs. And what they did is they interviewed 15,000 voters across seven battleground states to test different options for the Democratic nominee. That's quite a bit.

[31:30.14 - 32:04.14]

top line, alternative Democratic candidates run ahead of president Biden by an average of three points. across the battleground states. Nearly every tested Democrat performs better than the president. This includes vice-president Harris, who runs better than the president, but behind the average alternative, the top testing alternative candidates, aside from Harris and Biden. in alphabetical order are Mark Kelly, Senator from Arizona, Wes Moore, governor of Maryland, Josh Shapiro, governor of Pennsylvania, and Gretchen Whitmer, governor of Michigan.

[32:04.46 - 32:15.82]

And of course, we mentioned that a people that shows now two thirds of all democratic voters want Joe Biden to step aside, including every major demographic group. So what do you guys?

2
Speaker 2
[32:15.82 - 32:46.04]

think about that blue lab polling? Look, I think it is, everybody is sort of looking for polling to validate more confidence in this really uncertain moment. I think it is reassuring, if you want to make a change, that there's polling that shows, even before a campaign has begun, that these candidates start in a stronger position. I just think you'd have to take it with a grain of salt. You go into it, yes, because you are concerned about the swing state polling, you're concerned about the polling you're seeing about Biden, not just that the top line head to head numbers, but the extreme concern people have about his age.

[32:46.26 - 33:00.04]

But you go into it not because you think these other candidates are already pulling better, but because you believe if you make this change, then you have a candidate and that candidate can do the politics you need to do to ultimately overcome the disadvantages that Biden had. All these alternative democratic.

4
Speaker 4
[33:00.04 - 33:08.96]

candidates are running ahead of President Biden. That includes Vice President Harris. So she'll like that. Not great for the vice president is. voters are looking for a fresh face.

[33:08.96 - 33:44.40]

according to this polling in, those closely tied to the current administration perform relatively worse than other candidates. So that's interesting and notable and also probably tells you something about how Republicans would message a Harris candidacy. They would tie her to Joe Biden, obviously, and some of the challenges recently. Also interesting, some of the gains for these candidates are coming from winning undecideds and those who are supporting third parties, but they are also pulling votes from Donald Trump, and you keep your base as well. So, you know, listen, there's a lot of data out there right now.

[33:44.76 - 34:02.50]

Let's say, on balance, it has been generally worse for Joe Biden than Donald Trump. There's a couple polls that have been tied or up a little bit, so it's noisy out there. But, you know, this. this polling from Blue Lab suggests that some alternatives could fare well in November. Yeah, I mean, we have been.

1
Speaker 1
[34:03.08 - 34:36.08]

obviously pretty vocal about, you know, why we think Biden stepping aside would give us a better chance of defeating Donald Trump. But we should be honest that, like, none of the options in front of us are really great options right now, because there's just so much uncertainty. And, like you said, love it, like you cannot have the polling be the only determining factor in this decision. And I'm sure if Joe Biden makes the decision to step aside, it's not going to be just based on polling. And I think there are obviously risks that come with a Kamala Harris nomination.

[34:36.48 - 34:44.72]

A lot of those risks, I believe, are probably tied to the fact that she is part of the current administration. And there is this anti-incumbency vibe in the United States and all over the world.

4
Speaker 4
[34:44.72 - 34:50.30]

right now. Can she overcome it? I think so. But racism and misogyny and all sorts of other.

1
Speaker 1
[34:50.30 - 35:00.18]

currents. I do think, personally, she gives us a better chance than Joe Biden does at this point. And then you think, well, what about these very popular governors? And it's a fresh start. And, you know, I think.

[35:00.18 - 35:17.48]

but getting to the point of an open convention, figuring out which of those candidates are going to be and then making sure the candidate that we ultimately choose can withstand the national spotlight. Like it's just. there's no sure things here, but we're just, we're in a tough spot. And it's about what do you think is the riskiest move and what's the least risky?

3
Speaker 3
[35:17.48 - 35:32.14]

move? All those candidates other than Kamala Harris right now are basically generic Democrats, right? With a slight bio description, right? Generic Democrat who's a governor of a Midwestern state, or generic Democrat who's a senator who is also an astronaut. And once they become the nominee, they will be defined.

[35:32.74 - 35:41.86]

They have to define themselves and the Republicans will be racing to define them. And that that is so. these numbers are very. they're interesting. They're not particularly instructive about what a race would actually look like.

[35:42.32 - 35:55.82]

And I think just this is the point is there's no candidate here who guarantees a Democratic victory, not a one. There's no path that guarantees that. this is still a pretty Republican political environment. There's an anti incumbent environment. We are the incumbent party.

[35:56.24 - 36:07.10]

There. people are angry about the economy. They're angry about inflation. We are the incumbent party. And so, whether that candidate is Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, or one of these other people mentioned, we're still going to have to navigate those headwinds.

[36:07.20 - 36:27.52]

And there's downside risk too, that any of these candidates could do worse than Joe Biden is doing. I believe that they all have a lower floor, but a higher ceiling than Biden, because we know that the voters are screaming for someone other than Biden or Trump. And if we give them someone who passes some set of tests for that, you could have a good victory, but it's not a guarantee. It's just a question of what risks.

4
Speaker 4
[36:27.52 - 36:47.24]

you want to take. Well, yeah, I mean, I think the concern about Biden, where that's coming from, is that every candidate has vulnerabilities and you have to fight back against them. But I think the vulnerability of a large subset of the electorate thinking you are too old is an unfixable problem, because once they have that belief, they know no one gets younger. And I do.

2
Speaker 2
[36:47.24 - 37:18.50]

think that's why the Schiff statement, the Schumer statement, it's important because it creates pressure. But I also think it just underscores that that fundamental reality of what we're discussing is not changing. The other thing is the fact that some of these Democrats are pulling Trump voters, I think underscores, on the other side of what Dan's saying is, Donald Trump is a weak candidate. You know, as part of this polling, that said two-thirds of Democrats want Joe Biden to no longer be the nominee, a lot of Americans don't think Trump should be the nominee. These are both weak candidates.

[37:18.98 - 37:38.82]

And voters have been saying for a year, not the elites, the voters have been saying this for a long time, that they want a different option. Democrats have been saying for a long time that they thought Joe Biden was too old. It was everybody else hoping they could get to the end of this process without having to face that reality. But the debate changed that. And I think the fact that there are people out there saying, I'm right now a Trump voter, but I'm open to an.

3
Speaker 3
[37:38.82 - 38:08.30]

alternative. I think in that poll it is 27% of Republicans would prefer that Trump replaces the nominee. And if we were in a normal election cycle, that would be a huge, gigantic number for someone who's at their convention, who won their primary easily, and one in four members of their party want someone else to be the nominee. That is like a flashing red light, siren, weak candidate. But just because of the situation we're in, everyone's just throwing that number on like, look how strong Trump is.

[38:08.76 - 38:12.30]

Only a quarter of his voters hate him. The idea too,

2
Speaker 2
[38:12.36 - 38:30.06]

well, you know, all these Republicans want Trump to step aside and no one's clamoring for that. Luck, you know, obviously, Donald Trump is an incredible threat to the country, but politically they might be better off with somebody who wasn't carrying all this baggage. Nikki Haley would, might've been a stronger candidate than Donald Trump could ever have hoped to be. We'll never know. And we'll never, we'll never know.

1
Speaker 1
[38:30.14 - 38:46.92]

Okay. One quick note before we go, check out the Crooked Store. You can shop our new collection of merch for the summer and feel good knowing that a portion of the proceeds from every purchase goes to support organizations doing incredible work across the country to ensure every voice is heard. Pick up an Only You Can Prevent. Gender Reveals tee.

4
Speaker 4
[38:47.82 - 38:48.90]

I support that.

1
Speaker 1
[38:49.02 - 39:06.96]

For your next camping trip and wear a Hot People Vote tee to your next canvassing shift. Shop new merch at crooked.com slash store. All right. That's our show for tonight. We will be back tomorrow night with the grand finale, Trump's 90 minute plus speech at the RNC and everything else that happens tomorrow.

[39:07.82 - 39:09.76]

What else could happen? The news.

2
Speaker 2
[39:10.02 - 39:18.86]

The news. And, by the way, you know, gender reveals aren't something that can happen with a cake for a baby. They're what happens when a California teacher keeps a secret from your parents.

[39:21.82 - 39:22.46]

How's that?

1
Speaker 1
[39:22.72 - 39:23.66]

Have a good night, everyone.

[39:26.96 - 39:33.28]

If you want to get ad-free episodes, exclusive content, and more, consider joining our Friends of the Pod subscription community at crooked.

[39:33.28 - 39:52.46]

com slash friends. And if you're already doom scrolling, don't forget to follow us at Pod Save America on Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube for access to full episodes, bonus content, and more. Plus, if you're as opinionated as we are, consider dropping us a review. Pod Save America is a Crooked Media production. Our show is produced by Olivia Martinez and David Toledo.

[39:53.00 - 40:07.22]

Our associate producers are Saul Rubin and Farah Safari. Reed Cherlin is our executive producer. The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick. Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer, with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis. Writing support by Hallie Kiefer.

[40:07.22 - 40:20.20]

Madeline Herringer is our head of news and programming. Matt DeGroat is our head of production. Andy Taft is our executive assistant. Thanks to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Haley Jones, Mia Kelman, David Toles, Kiril Pelaviv, and Molly Lobel.

v1.0.0.241121-8_os